A recent newspaper article reports that a 14-year-old boy who seriously destroyed his school got a punishment to clean streets instead of sent to the prison, do you think this is right, or the young criminals should be sent to the jail?

Juvenile crime places societies in a difficult position because young offenders must be held responsible while still being recognised as immature and capable of change. I believe that requiring a 14-year-old who seriously damaged his school to clean streets is more appropriate than imprisonment, provided the punishment is combined with supervision, restitution, and rehabilitative support.